🔗 Share this article

Families whose relatives buried in graves at risk from coastal erosion argue that indecision over how to tackle the issue is creating unnecessary distress concerning the final resting places of their loved ones.

An Impending Threat to Ancient Churchyards

The council have identified three church graveyards in the communities of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being at risk of being consumed by the sea in the coming decades.

A newly published study on the situation details a range of options, from taking no action to exhuming remains and reburying them in more secure sites. Officials say it is for the community to decide how to move forward.

“At the moment we’re in limbo. It upsets me. My parents wanted this to serve as their last home, but it isn’t going to be because of the encroaching sea.”

Estimates suggest at least a portion of one graveyard could be claimed by the sea in the next 80 years, but some locals fear it will happen far earlier. “In my view it’s got under 20 years, if you look at what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” one said.

Troubled by the Ghosts of Eccles

A local business owner remembered a school trip to the nearby settlement of Eccles, which has almost entirely disappeared into the water, along with its place of worship and burial ground.

“It was possible to see human remains,” she said. “Certain people hold this romantic idea that the deceased will just get washed out to the ocean. That is not the case. People will collect remains as mementos and go plundering graves looking for valuables. It’s completely undignified.”

“I fear that the same thing that happened at Eccles will happen at Happisburgh and there’ll be bones on the shore. I would feel appalled by that.”

A Paratrooper's Resting Place in Peril

Further up the shoreline is situated the burial plot of a former paratrooper who died while serving abroad. His mother said she could not sleep after learning her child's final plot might one day be relocated.

“It does disturb me to think this may not remain his lasting home,” she said. “For us it’s an significant site to visit.”

She believes, new interments should cease but says it is premature to exhume existing graves. “What I would choose for now is to take no action and closely monitor, but an timely resolution needs to be made when a tipping point has been attained.”

Seeking Solutions and Clarity

An absence of agreement over when and how to tackle the challenge has resulted in grieving relatives feeling exasperated and anxious.

Some want additional coastal protections to delay the inevitable erosion and to permit funerals to continue for now. Different voices argue the moment for relocation is approaching.

“It is very emotional,” a family member stated. “The official study was thorough, but now there’s confusion about how it is taken forward. And all parties is avoiding responsibility over who is responsible.”

A coastal manager confirmed the burial sites were owned and managed of the church authorities. “In the end it is up to them to choose the direction to take. Our role is here to help support them through that journey with communities.”

It was also stated there was time to weigh all the options. “We are talking many years before it begins getting lost.”

“Currently, there exists no common view on what should be done yet. It requires productive local conversations to discover the right solutions for each village.”

The prospect of losing the churches and graveyards was labeled one of “immense sadness for the area,” but church representatives also referenced a doctrine in resurrection, offering a theological perspective on the physical disappearance of sacred ground.