🔗 Share this article

Tehran is ready to reinitiate nuclear negotiations with Washington on condition that it is treated with "respect" and "respect", Tehran's foreign minister has declared.

Abbas Araghchi declared exclusively dialogue was effective, and shared fresh requests had come from go-betweens to restart discussions with the Trump administration. He said Iran did not have undeclared nuclear sites, and Iran was not yet able to allow the International Atomic Energy Agency to access attacked atomic facilities for safety concerns.

Walking a Difficult Course

The foreign minister is navigating a difficult route since Iran wishes not to be seen to be proceeding from a situation of disadvantage, and he consistently maintained that Iran had come out more resilient militarily and emotionally from the joint assault on its nuclear sites in June.

He was talking at a defense forum in Tehran where he reaffirmed that Iran had "an inalienable right to process nuclear material within its borders that it will perpetually retain" – the main reason of the deadlock in the previous talks.

Earlier Discussions Unexpectedly Ended

The previous five rounds of discussions between the United States and Iran were ended suddenly and hostile conclusion on 12 June when Israel, with US support, targeted Iranian nuclear sites in a fortnight-long engagement that ended with the American leader asserting the locations had been eliminated. Afterward, European countries exercised their right to reimpose UN-wide sanctions, but Iran insists they have not had a substantial consequence.

Perfect Agreement Suggested

Iranian officials said they felt they had attained a "ideal resolution" to the uranium processing matter in previous talks, when it was agreed an domestic cooperative with US participation could refine atomic fuel. Both sides would have been able to declare success since domestic enrichment would have continued and the US could be certain that Iran's enrichment initiative was solely for peaceful purposes.

It had not been agreed in the discussions that US nuclear scientists could function inside Iran, but that was a logical implication of the partnership suggestion. Officials asserted on multiple occasions they had secured an understanding with Washington's diplomat the American negotiator only for the agreement to disintegrate due to "detractors in America".

Existing Status

Tehran representatives declared the cooperative arrangement was now withdrawn, but it seems quite possible the proposal could be revived in various formats if talks resume.

The US president last week claimed he had been obtaining communications that Iran desired to restart talks, but privately Tehran representatives claim they are not yet receiving clear proposals from the United States either directly or from key regional mediators, such as Qatar, Egypt, the Omani authorities and Saudi Arabia. The Iran's state department has been accused of non-responsiveness in the aftermath of Washington's unmediated tactics, but Iran asserts dialogue is not part of a show.

Political Position

In his remarks to the conference, aimed to portray the US as a hegemonic power that exploits the concept of international law, Araghchi declared the 12-day war demonstrated the dispute could not be resolved by combat operations. He asserted the attacks began with a American requirement for an total Iran submission and culminated with an absolute demand for a ceasefire.

Iran is convinced the first strikes by Israel were carried out with full US knowledge and coordination, making confidence difficult to restore.

Dialogue Stays the Ultimate Resolution

Araghchi stated: "Tehran was not the one that had fled diplomacy; it was the United States and the Western nations that had repeatedly tried to dictate their desires during the discussions. Negotiations can still be active and continues the primary resolution to settle disputes, but its requirements, rules and principles must be adhered to."

"If they address to the nation of Iran with the approach of respect and honor, they will obtain a answer in the same language."

Repair and Reconstruction

In what is described by Iranian officials as the battle of repair and rebuilding, the foreign minister stated he was certain Iran's defence capabilities "are much stronger than prior to 13 or 14 June of this year. All our capabilities have been rebuilt. We acquired numerous insights from this war; we have discovered our internal vulnerabilities and the shortcomings of the adversary."

He stated: "We effectively endured this engagement. Our atomic expertise, which they intended to obliterate, continues to exist. The installations and equipment, if eliminated, will be restored; what is important is the will of the nation of Iran and then the national cohesion that they sought to undermine, but were unable to break. The citizens of Tehran have developed more powerful, more integrated, and more backing of the leadership and the nation in the wake of this assault."